I have a standard gridserver account with (mt). they now want to charge me an extra $20/month because they claim that my MySQL usage doesn’t work for them. They’re complaining about one line in the report:
44 Hit:Insert 0.18:1
And the explanation from their Run MySQL Report function:
The other ratio is Hit:Insert. This ratio indicates QC effectiveness. Ideally, the MySQL server should insert a bunch of stable queries into the QC, then get a lot more hits on them. Therefore, this ratio should be heavy on the hit side if the QC is effective. If it is heavy on the insert side, then the QC is not really helping much and it is probably too volatile. Consider a Hit:Insert ratio of 1:1. This practically means that a cached result is only used once before it is replaced. This completely defeats the idea of a query cache. A worse ratio, like 0.34:1, indicates that some results are not even hit before they are pruned or replaced.
My site really doesn’t get that many hits but Mint looks to be the culprit. I contacted (mt) technical support asking if I should stop using mint.
(mt) said this: I have rebooted your container just now. In our experience MINT does indeed cause many problems with sites running in the SmartPool v.2, so this will most likely resolve your issues.
So their response is that I should stop using mint? That doesn’t seem good, particularly about a site that’s “in partnership” with them, whatever that means.
Can anyone offer advice as to how to clear this up and continue using mint? Something I can configure either in mint or (in the limited way that I have access to) in mysql?
I don’t want to go back to google analytics but neither do I want to pay $20 more a month just to deal with a query cache issue on a site that gets, at best, 2500 hits a day (fairly evenly distributed).
Help!
And thanks!